Quantcast
Channel: Intel Communities: Message List
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 17767

Re: Intel Edison an Expensive Arduino Nano

$
0
0

As pointed out in other threads on the forum, Intel is looking to provide the access to Quark in an upcoming release, "hopefully before the end of the year", so I am confident that it is forth coming and appreciate the amount of effort to test and then document well so that it satisfies the many facets of this group.

ARK | Intel® Quark™ SoC X1000 (16K Cache, 400 MHz) ... and the Galileo forums clearly show that once accessed, it is a very powerful component already included on the Edison SoC. 

As a maker, I could say that I also faced a similar type of concern of the unknown, so I can relate. The realization of board designs change.  Myself, I will probably implement v1 with the capabilities I have now, and v2 with extended capabilities I'll have later.  And if I am at a point where my mass production relies so heavily on me knowing, I am sure I would have already signed any NDAs required and possibly selected other chips and components to suit.  You begin to worry about board design, that is a level where the designers (including your embedded engineers at Intel) are more than capable of working those things out.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 17767

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>